Biennial Instructor Hour
It's been a while since my last entry but now I have a few things to write about, there will be further posts in the next couple of weeks. Firstly, here's a brief description of my first flight of 2013.
Further posts will include:
1- IMC Renewal Test in PA34 Seneca
2- SR20 Currency flight
3- PA34 Seneca Solo Flight
Every two years I have to renew my Single Engine Piston (SEP) rating by flying at least twelve hours, completing twelve take offs and landings and undergoing a flight of at least one hour with an instructor. These requirements have to be completed in the last year of validity of the SEP rating.
As I also have a
multi-engine rating (MEP), I fly with an instructor more often than the single
engine pilot may necessarily do. This is because a flight test is
required every year for the multi rating. No flight test is required to renew
an SEP rating. In addition, the flying club I use requires a six-monthly
currency check as well. All this adds up to me flying fairly regularly with an
instructor.
Two years ago I completed
my biennial instructor hour in a Cirrus SR20, but this renewal was to be in my
grouped Piper Arrow. As my Instrument Meteorological Conditions (IMC) rating
was also due to expire soon, I wanted to combine the instructor hour with some
instrument flying and an ILS at Blackpool.
The weather for this
flight was not good. The report for Blackpool gave 4000 metres visibility with
broken clouds at 400 feet. Those would be challenging conditions for a pilot in
current practice, which I wasn’t! However, my instructor held an Instrument Rating
(IR) which allowed him to fly down to only 200 feet above the surface still in the clouds, and that
meant we were going to fly.
Almost immediately after
take-off, I began flying on instruments only, so I couldn’t tell you when we
entered the clouds. I looked up on a couple of occasions and all I saw was a
milky whiteness. I checked the weather via the VHF radio and found it to be as
expected, with a low cloud base of 400 feet. I contacted Blackpool approach
and, shortly after selecting a transponder code, the controller came back to
tell me we were identified and the approach would be radar vectors to the ILS,
runway 28.
My first vector was
heading 355 to maintain 2000 feet, before further turns to the left were given
and I was asked to report established on the localizer. I turned us onto the
final approach track and waited for the glide slope needle to move down the
course deviation indicator (CDI). Maintaining 2000 feet, it wasn’t long before
the indicator centred. I lowered the undercarriage and commenced descent
towards my decision altitude of 550 feet. As the clouds were reported at 400
feet I was expecting to either see nothing at decision altitude and commence a
missed approach, or be told by my instructor to continue down to his decision
altitude of 200 feet.
I was calling off the
altitude every hundred feet and at 600 feet I looked up to see the runway in a
position suitable for me to land. This was the first time I’d completed a real
(not practice) approach to minimums and it was a great feeling to know that I
could do it. The cloud base was actually a little higher than reported, but it was
still serious IFR weather.
I lowered the flaps to
full and did a touch and go on the runway, transferring to instruments again
shortly after take-off. We climbed up through the clouds and headed back to
Barton. When I started to fly visually again, I found we were over
scattered/broken cloud tops. A descent and visual landing back at City Airport
rounded off the sortie.
I was very pleased with
this flight as not only had I completed my biennial instructor hour, but had
also refreshed my instrument flying currency and had an approach signed off by
my instructor. This was doubly useful as it meant that my IMC renewal test the
following week would only need to consist of one approach and not two. Therefore
there should be less stress for my test, particularly as I was doing it in the
Seneca, a twin engine aircraft.
The next post will detail
how I got on with the IMC renewal test.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home